4.8 Article

Organelle Size Scaling of the Budding Yeast Vacuole by Relative Growth and Inheritance

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages 1221-1228

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Herbert Boyer Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. NIH NRSA [1F32GM090442-01A1]
  3. NIH [R01 GM097017, P50 GM081879]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has long been noted that larger animals have larger organs compared to smaller animals of the same species, a phenomenon termed scaling [1]. Julian Huxley proposed an appealingly simple model of relative growth''-in which an organ and the whole body grow with their own intrinsic rates [2]-that was invoked to explain scaling in organs from fiddler crab claws to human brains. Because organ size is regulated by complex, unpredictable pathways [3], it remains unclear whether scaling requires feedback mechanisms to regulate organ growth in response to organ or body size. The molecular pathways governing organelle biogenesis are simpler than organogenesis, and therefore organelle size scaling in the cell provides a more tractable case for testing Huxley's model. We ask the question: is it possible for organelle size scaling to arise if organelle growth is independent of organelle or cell size? Using the yeast vacuole as a model, we tested whether mutants defective in vacuole inheritance, vac8 Delta and vac17 Delta, tune vacuole biogenesis in response to perturbations in vacuole size. In vac8 Delta/vac17 Delta, vacuole scaling increases with the replicative age of the cell. Furthermore, vac8 Delta/vac17 Delta cells continued generating vacuole at roughly constant rates even when they had significantly larger vacuoles compared to wild-type. With support from computational modeling, these results suggest there is no feedback between vacuole biogenesis rates and vacuole or cell size. Rather, size scaling is determined by the relative growth rates of the vacuole and the cell, thus representing a cellular version of Huxley's model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available