4.7 Article

Experimental study on the effectiveness of strengthening over-deformed segmental tunnel lining by steel plates

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103530

Keywords

Segmental tunnel lining; Steel plate strengthening; Model test

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51538009, 51978516]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [19DZ1200803]
  3. Key Innovation Team Program of Innovation Talents Promotion Plan by Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016RA4059]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The method of using steel plates to strengthen existing tunnel linings has been widely applied in many tunnel rehabilitation projects around the world. However, the effectiveness of the strengthening resulting from this method is still unclear, especially for conditions when the segmental linings are deformed to a relatively large extent. In this paper, a series of physical model tests conducted in 1-g plane strain conditions were designed to study the strengthening effectiveness of steel plates for over-deformed segmental tunnel linings. The results show that the segmental tunnel linings affected by the ground surface surcharge will deform nonlinearly, as the complex behaviour of the segment joints at different positions lead to a gradual degradation of the tunnel overall performance. Once the deformed segmental tunnel linings were strengthened by steel plates, the stiffness and capacity of the tunnel were improved by 190% and 69%, respectively, compared to those without strengthening. Subsequently, the strengthening effectiveness of tunnels strengthened at different deformation stages are compared quantitatively. It is found that an increase in the tunnel deformation before strengthening led to a decrease in the stiffness and an increase in the total capacity of the tunnel after strengthening, while the increased capacity was less affected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available