4.2 Article

The immunological architecture of granulomatous inflammation in central nervous system tuberculosis

Journal

TUBERCULOSIS
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2020.102016

Keywords

Central nervous system tuberculosis; Tuberculous meningitis; Rich focus; Granuloma; Immunohi stochemistry; 3D-reconstruction

Funding

  1. 'Mr. Willem Bakhuys Roozeboomstichting' (The Netherlands)
  2. National Research Foundation of South Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Of all tuberculosis (TB) cases, 1% affects the central nervous system (CNS), with a mortality rate of up to 60%. Our aim is to fill the 'key gap' in TBM research by analyzing brain specimens in a unique historical cohort of 84 patients, focusing on granuloma formation. We describe three different types: non-necrotizing, necrotizing gummatous, and necrotizing abscess type granuloma. Our hypothesis is that these different types of granuloma are developmental stages of the same pathological process. All types were present in each patient and were mainly localized in the leptomeninges. Intra-parenchymal granulomas were less abundant than the leptomeningeal ones and mainly located close to the cerebrospinal fluid (subpial and subependymal). We found that most of the intraparenchymal granulomas are an extension of leptomeningeal lesions which is the opposite of the classical Rich focus theory. We present a 3D-model to facilitate further understanding of the topographic relation of granulomas with leptomeninges, brain parenchyma and blood vessels. We describe innate and adaptive immune responses during granuloma formation including the cytokine profiles. We emphasize the presence of leptomeningeal B-cell aggregates as tertiary lymphoid structures. Our study forms a basis for further research in neuroinflammation and infectious diseases of the CNS, especially TB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available