4.7 Review

Critical Assessment of G Protein-Biased Agonism at the μ-Opioid Receptor

Journal

TRENDS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 41, Issue 12, Pages 947-959

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.09.009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [APP1072113]
  2. Academy of Medical Sciences Professorship
  3. Medical Research Council UK [MR/S010890/1, MR/N020669/1]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB/TR166-TPC5, SCHU924/11-3, SCHU924/18-1]
  5. Else Kroner Fresenius Stiftung [2019_A68]
  6. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research [AMSP 03]
  7. MRC [MR/S010890/1, MR/N020669/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

G protein-biased agonists of the mu-opioid receptor (MOPr) have been proposed as an improved class of opioid analgesics. Recent studies have been unable to reproduce the original experiments in the beta-arrestin2-knockout mouse that led to this proposal, and alternative genetic models do not support the G protein-biased MOPr agonist hypothesis. Furthermore, assessment of putatively biased ligands has been confounded by several factors, including assay amplification. As such, the extent to which current lead compounds represent mechanistically novel, extremely G protein-biased agonists is in question, as is the underlying assumption that beta-arrestin2 mediates deleterious opioid effects. Addressing these current challenges represents a pressing issue to successfully advance drug development at this receptor and improve upon current opioid analgesics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available