Journal
TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 133, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116065
Keywords
Analytical methods; Metric tool; Validation; Green chemistry; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Hexagon; RGB model; Sunset yellow FCF
Categories
Funding
- National Science Centre, Poland [2019/35/B/ST4/01022]
- EU FEDER
- Gobierno de Espana MCIU-AEI [CTQ2017-90082-P]
- Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO 2016/109, 2020/078]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Critical and global evaluation of analytical methods should be one of the primary goals in analytical chemistry. A holistic approach, however, requires a look at the varied features: commonly discussed validation criteria, often underrated practical and economic aspects, and typically overlooked compliance with the principles of green analytical chemistry. Carrying out such an assessment in a critical and transparent way is extremely difficult without special tools. The purpose of this work is to discuss and compare the three different approaches that seem to be potential candidates: multi-criteria decision analysis methods (MCDA), HEXAGON, and RGB model. The basic principles of each methodology, individual possibilities offered, and the results of the assessment of selected model methods will be presented. Ultimately, the potential compatibility of assessing the same group of methods using different tools will be examined. This contribution can help to select optimal tool and conduct more thorough and insightful assessments. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available