4.5 Article

Vape shop and consumer activity during COVID-19 non-essential business closures in the USA

Journal

TOBACCO CONTROL
Volume 30, Issue E1, Pages E41-E44

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056171

Keywords

electronic nicotine delivery devices; public policy; surveillance and monitoring; tobacco industry

Funding

  1. US National Cancer Institute [R01CA215155-01A1, R01CA179422-01, R01CA239178-01A1, 5R01CA06785, R01CA217165, P01CA225597, R01 CA229238]
  2. US National Institutes of Health/Fogarty International Center [1R01TW010664-01]
  3. US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/Fogarty International Center [D43ES030927-01]
  4. California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program Award (TRDRP Grant) [26IR-0016]
  5. National Cancer Institute and FDA Center for Tobacco Products Award (NCI/FDA) [U54CA180905]
  6. US National Institutes of Health [R01CA204891, U01DA045537, R21DA046333]
  7. US Food and Drug Administration [R01CA204891, U01DA045537, R21DA046333]
  8. California Department of Public Health, California Tobacco Control Program [17-10041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many vape shops did not comply with state orders for closure, and e-cigarette users were more likely to stockpile vape products rather than attempting to reduce or quit using e-cigarettes.
Introduction Vaping and vape shops pose risk for COVID-19 and its transmission. Objectives We examined vape shop non-compliance with state-ordered business closures during COVID-19, changes in their marketing and experiences among consumers. Methods As part of a longitudinal study of vape retail in six metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs; Atlanta, Boston, Minneapolis, Oklahoma City, San Diego and Seattle), we conducted: (1) legal research to determine whether statewide COVID-19 orders required vape shops to close; (2) phone-based and web-based surveillance to assess vape shop activity in March-June 2020 during shelter-in-place periods; and (3) a concurrent online survey of e-cigarette users about their experiences with vape retail. Results Non-essential business closure varied in timing/duration across states and applied to vape shops in California, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oklahoma (for a brief period) and Washington (Georgia's orders were ambiguous). Surveillance analysis focused on the five MSAs in these states. Of 156 vape shops, 53.2% were open as usual, 11.5% permanently closed and 3.8% temporarily closed; 31.4% offered pick-up/delivery services. Among survey respondents (n=354, M (age) =23.9 +/- 4.6; 46.9% male, 71.8% white, 13.0% Hispanic), 27.4% worried their vape shop would close/go out of business during COVID-19; 7.3% said their vape shop did so. Few noticed increases in vape product delivery options (7.3%), discounts/price promotions (9.9%) and/or prices (9.3%). While 20.3% stockpiled vape products, 20.3% tried to reduce use and 15.8% tried to quit. Conclusions Many vape shops were non-compliant with state COVID-19 orders. E-cigarette users were as likely to stockpile vape products as to attempt to reduce or quit using e-cigarettes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available