4.7 Article

Effect of elliptical notches on mechanical response and progressive damage of FMLs under tensile loading

Journal

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
Volume 154, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.106866

Keywords

Fiber metal laminates; Digital image correlation; Notch strength; Progressive damage analysis; Failure mechanism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51879248, 51609089]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M592338]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper aims to explore the residual strength and elucidate the failure mechanisms of elliptical notched FMLs with different design variables through experimental investigations and numerical simulations. Quasi-static tensile experiments are carried out to investigate the effects of off-axis angle, inclination angle and aspect ratio on the tension behaviors with the aid of digital image correlation technique (DIC). Subsequently, a progressive damage model integrated with a VUMAT subroutine is employed to study the progressive damage evolution and failure mechanism, considering thermal residual stress. Meanwhile, damage initiation and evolution as well as the finial damage patterns are explored systemically combining the strain distributions from DIC technique, equivalent plastic strain distributions of aluminum layers and final damage morphologies of specimens. Results show that the notch strength is more sensitive to off-axis angle and inclination angle as compared with the aspect ratio. The failure morphology exhibits a neat and straight crack for on-axis cases, whereas it presents a fracture along the fiber direction of adjacent layer with apparent pull out of fiber for off-axis cases. With the increase of off-axis angle, the ultimate failure mode gradually transfers from fiber-driven to aluminum-driven accompanied by the corresponding critical failure mechanism varying from tension to tension-shear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available