4.4 Article

Nanoscale structural characterization of manganite thin films integrated to silicon correlated with their magnetic and electric properties

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 709, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2020.138189

Keywords

Nanoscale structure; Oxides; Pulsed Laser Deposition; ferromagnetism

Funding

  1. FONCYT [PICT 2014-1047, 016-0867]
  2. CONICET [PIP 112-201501-00213]
  3. MINCYT
  4. H2020-MSCA-RISE-2016 SPICOLOST [734187]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A detailed nanoscale structural characterization was performed on high-quality La0.66Sr0.33MnO3 (LSMO) thin films of different thicknesses and deposited by pulsed laser deposition onto buffered Si (100) substrates. A multilayered structure built of Y0.13Zr0.87O2 (YSZ) and CeO2 layers was used as buffer in order to optimize the manganite films growth. The stacking of the different layers, their morpholohy, composition and strains were analysed using different experimental techniques. In-situ characterization of the films, performed with reflection high-energy electron diffraction, revealed their epitaxial growth and smooth surfaces. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) images showed sharp interfaces between the constituents lattices and combined with energy-dispersive X-ray analysis allowed us to determine that there was no ion interdifussion across them. The Fourier-Fast-Transform of the HR-TEM images was used to resolve the epitaxy relationship between the layers, resulting in [100] LSMO (001) parallel to [110] CeO2 (001) parallel to [110] YSZ (001) parallel to [110] Si (001). The LSMO thin films were found to be ferromagnetic and metallic at low temperature regardless their thickness. The effect of strains and defects was only detected in films thinner than 15 nm and put in evidence by X-ray diffraction patterns and correlated with magnetic and electrical parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available