Insert devices for faecal incontinence

Background Faecal incontinence (FI) affects 1-19% of the general population and carries significant physical and psychological morbidity. Treatment strategies vary greatly with respect to morbidity and efficacy and relatively little is known regarding the role of mechanical devices such as anal and vaginal inserts. This is an up-to-date systematic review of the use of these devices in the management of patients with FI. Methods A systematic electronic search was performed of the Medline, Pubmed and Embase databases using the key words and/or MeSH 'anal plug', 'anal insert', 'vaginal insert' and 'faecal incontinence'. Only articles that reported clinical outcomes for these devices for FI in the English language were included. Review articles were excluded to avoid duplication of data. Results Thirteen articles fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Two articles reported outcomes for the Eclipse vaginal insert and 11 articles reported on three types of anal inserts; the Coloplast 'Tulip' design (6), the Procon/ProTect device (2) and the Renew insert (3). When tolerated, both anal and vaginal inserts significantly improved continence, bowel function and quality of life where reported. Adverse effects included discomfort, leakage and slippage. Long-term compliance and benefit are yet to be determined. Conclusions Vaginal and anal inserts may be a useful treatment for FI. Better quality of evidence is needed to define its effectiveness.

Automated summary

Faecal incontinence is a common condition that can have significant physical and psychological impacts. Mechanical devices such as anal and vaginal inserts have shown to improve continence, bowel function, and quality of life in some cases, but more high-quality evidence is needed to determine their long-term effectiveness.