Journal
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
Volume 35, Issue 9, Pages 5231-5238Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08018-0
Keywords
Laparoscopic liver; Laparoscopic hepatectomy; Minimally invasive liver; Minimally invasive hepatectomy; Cirrhosis; Difficulty score
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The presence of liver cirrhosis significantly affects both the intraoperative technical difficulty and postoperative outcomes of MILR, suggesting that cirrhosis should be considered an important parameter in future difficulty scoring systems for MILR.
Introduction The impact of liver cirrhosis on the difficulty of minimal invasive liver resection (MILR) remains controversial and current difficulty scoring systems do not take in to account the presence of cirrhosis as a significant factor in determining the difficulty of MILR. We hypothesized that the difficulty of MILR is affected by the presence of cirrhosis. Hence, we performed a 1:1 matched-controlled study comparing the outcomes between patients undergoing MILR with and without cirrhosis including the Iwate system and Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (IMM) system in the matching process. Methods Between 2006 and 2019, 598 consecutive patients underwent MILR of which 536 met the study inclusion criteria. There were 148 patients with cirrhosis and 388 non-cirrhotics. One-to-one coarsened exact matching identified approximately exact matches between 100 cirrhotic patients and 100 non-cirrhotic patients. Results Comparison between MILR patients with cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis in the entire cohort demonstrated that patients with cirrhosis were associated with a significantly increased open conversion rate, transfusion rate, need for Pringles maneuver, postoperative, stay, postoperative morbidity and postoperative 90-day mortality. After 1:1 coarsened exact matching, MILR with cirrhosis were significantly associated with an increased open conversion rate (15% vs 6%,p = 0.03), operation time (261 vs 238 min,p < 0.001), blood loss (607 vs 314 mls,p = 0.002), transfusion rate (22% vs 9%,p = 0.001), need for application of Pringles maneuver (51% vs 34%,p = 0.010), postoperative stay (6 vs 4.5 days,p = 0.004) and postoperative morbidity (26% vs 13%,p = 0.029). Conclusion The presence of liver cirrhosis affected both the intraoperative technical difficulty and postoperative outcomes of MILR and hence should be considered an important parameter to be included in future difficulty scoring systems for MILR.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available