Journal
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE
Volume 197, Issue 1, Pages 56-62Publisher
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01682-0
Keywords
Biological evaluation; Normal tissue complication probability; Second malignancy; IMRT; 3D-CRT
Funding
- Projekt DEAL
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Mediastinal radiotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma, especially when combined with bleomycin, may lead to significant pulmonary morbidity and mortality. The use of modern techniques like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is becoming more popular for sparing organs at risk. Analysis of different radiation techniques showed a significant decrease in lung toxicity risk with standard APPA plans compared to IMRT plans, with 7-field IMRT posing a higher risk than 5-field IMRT.
Purpose Mediastinal radiotherapy (RT), especially when combined with bleomycin, may result in substantial pulmonary morbidity and mortality. The use of modern RT techniques like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is gaining interest to spare organs at risk. Methods We evaluated 27 patients who underwent RT for Hodgkin's lymphoma between 2009 and 2013at our institution. For each patient, three different treatment plans for a 30-Gy involved-field RT (IFRT) were created (anterior-posterior-posterior-anterior setup [APPA], 5-field IMRT, and 7-field IMRT) and analyzed concerning their inherent normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for pneumonitis and secondary pulmonary malignancy. Results The comparison of different radiation techniques showed a significant difference in favor of standard APPA (p< 0.01). The risk of lung toxicity was significantly higher in plans using 7-field IMRT than in plans using 5-field IMRT. The absolute juxtaposition showed an increase in risk for radiation pneumonitis of 1% for plans using 5-field IMRT over APPA according to QUANTEC (Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic) parameters (Burman: 0.15%) and 2.6% when using 7-field IMRT over APPA (Burman: 0.7%) as well as 1.6% when using 7-field IMRT over 5-field IMRT (Burman: 0.6%). Further analysis showed an increase in risk for secondary pulmonary malignancies to be statistically significant (p< 0.01); mean induction probability for pulmonary malignoma was 0.1% higher in plans using 5-field IMRT than APPA and 0.19% higher in plans using 7-field IMRT than APPA as well as 0.09% higher in plans using 7-field IMRT than 5-field IMRT. During a median follow-up period of 65 months (95% confidence interval: 53.8-76.2 months), only one patient developed radiation-induced pneumonitis. No secondary pulmonary malignancies have been detected to date. Conclusion Radiation-induced lung toxicity is rare after treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma but may be influenced significantly by the RT technique used. In this study, APPA RT plans demonstrated a decrease in potential radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary malignancies. Biological planning using NTCP may have the potential to define personalized RT strategies
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available