4.7 Article

Imidazolyl-benzocoumarins as ratiometric fluorescence probes for biologically extreme acidity

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2020.119088

Keywords

pH probe; extreme acidity; Ratiometric probe; Benzocoumarin; Coumarin

Categories

Funding

  1. Global Research Laboratory Program - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF2014K1A1A2064569]
  2. Basic Science Research Program - Ministry of Education [NRF2019R1A2C2085438]
  3. Technology Development Program - Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS), Korea [S2632282]
  4. Korea Technology & Information Promotion Agency for SMEs (TIPA) [S2632282] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rational approach to develop a fluorescent probe for sensing biologically extreme acidity is described. The probe, a push-full type 3-(imidazolyl)benzocoumarin dye, has the lowest pK(a) value among known ratiometric probes. The probe has high quantum yields, chemical stability and aqueous solubility, and it has been successfully used for ratiometric fluorescence imaging of intrabacterial acidity, providing a practical means for studying biological systems under extreme pH conditions.
A rational approach to develop a fluorescent probe for sensing biologically extreme acidity (pH <3) is disclosed. The probe, a push-full type 3-(imidazolyl)benzocoumarin dye, has the lowest pK(a) = 1.3 among ratiometric probes known so far, which is ascribed due to a unique sensing mechanism. The probe has high quantum yields, high chemical stability and good aqueous solubility. The probe was successfully applied to ratiometric fluorescence imaging of intrabacterial acidity from pH 4.0-1.0, offering a practical means for studying biological systems under the extreme pH conditions. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available