4.6 Article

Effects of retro-reflective and angular-selective retro-reflective materials on solar energy in urban canyons

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY
Volume 209, Issue -, Pages 662-673

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.085

Keywords

Retro-reflective materials; Angular-selective retro-reflective materials; Solar accessibility; Urban canyon modelling

Categories

Funding

  1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (Trondheim, Norway)
  2. University of Perugia (Perugia, Italy)
  3. CIRIAF Interuniversity Research Center on Pollution and Environment Mauro Felli

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study deals with the application of retro-reflective (RR) and angular-selective retro-reflective (AS-RR) coatings on surfaces (i.e. the street ground and the south-exposed facade) within the urban canyon. Solar analyses were conducted at different latitudes (Oslo, Milan, and Cairo) by varying the urban canyon height-to-width ratio (H/W) to determine the variation in solar irradiation absorbed by north and south facades. Both summer and winter conditions were considered, and up to five material patterns (one reference case and four enhanced scenarios) were investigated for each combination of latitude and height-to-width ratio values. A validated Monte Carlo-based numerical model was used to conduct full-ray tracing analyses and to simulate the behavior of these coatings. The outcomes allowed the development of guidelines for the adoptions of RR and AS-RR materials in different scenarios. It was demonstrated that RR and AS-RR materials applied to the street performed better in low-density urban environment (H/W <= 0.5) with a consequent increase of the solar energy gains on the north facade by up to 15%. Employing RR and AS-RR materials on the south-exposed facade showed greater effectiveness on high-density urban canyon (H/w >= 2.0) and reduced by up to -8% the solar irradiation absorbed by the facade.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available