4.6 Article

Generalized trapezoidal hesitant fuzzy numbers and their applications to multi criteria decision-making problems

Journal

SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 1017-1032

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-020-05201-2

Keywords

Fuzzy sets; Hesitant fuzzy sets; Generalized trapezoidal hesitant fuzzy (GTHF) numbers; Score; Standard deviation degree; Deviation degree; Aggregation operators; Multi-criteria decision-making

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a decision-making method is proposed to solve multi-criteria decision-making problems by introducing the concept of generalized trapezoidal hesitant fuzzy numbers and some basic operational laws, with a numerical example provided to validate the reasonableness and applicability of the proposed method.
Generalized hesitant trapezoidal fuzzy number whose membership degrees are expressed by several possible trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, is more adequate or sufficient to solve real-life decision problem than real numbers. Therefore, in this paper, to model the some multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems, we define concept of generalized trapezoidal hesitant fuzzy (GTHF) number, whose membership degrees of an element to a given set are expressed by several different generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers in the set of real numbersR. Then, we introduce some basic operational laws of GTHF-numbers and some properties of them. Also, we propose a decision-making method to solve the MCDM problems in which criteria values take the form of GTHF information. To use in proposed decision-making method, we first give definitions of some concepts such as score, standard deviation degree, deviation degree of GTHF-numbers. We second develop some GTHF aggregation operators called the GTHF-number weighted geometric operator, GTHF-number weighted arithmetic operator, GTHF-number weighted geometric operator, GTHF-number weighted arithmetic operator. Finally, we give a numerical example for proposed MCDM to validate the reasonable and applicable of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available