4.8 Article

Melt Electrospinning of Nanofibers from Medical-Grade Poly(ε-Caprolactone) with a Modified Nozzle

Journal

SMALL
Volume 16, Issue 44, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202003471

Keywords

hybrid fabrication; melt electrospinning; melt electrowriting; nanofibers; poly(caprolactone); polymer processing

Funding

  1. EACEA program BIOFAB [2013/3137001-001, INST 105022/58-1 FUGG]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [326998133-TRR 225]
  3. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Melt electrospun fibers, in general, have larger diameters than normally achieved with solution electrospinning. This study uses a modified nozzle to direct-write melt electrospun medical-grade poly(epsilon-caprolactone) onto a collector resulting in fibers with the smallest average diameter being 275 +/- 86 nm under certain processing conditions. Within a flat-tipped nozzle is a small acupuncture needle positioned so that reduces the flow rate to approximate to 0.1 mu L h(-1)and has the sharp tip protruding beyond the nozzle, into the Taylor cone. The investigations indicate that 1-mm needle protrusion coupled with a heating temperature of 120 degrees C produce the most consistent, small diameter nanofibers. Using different protrusion distances for the acupuncture needle results in an unstable jet that deposited poor quality fibers that, in turn, affects the next adjacent path. The material quality is notably affected by the direct-writing speed, which became unstable above 10 mm min(-1). Coupled with a dual head printer, first melt electrospinning, then melt electrowriting could be performed in a single, automated process for the first time. Overall, the approach used here resulted in some of the smallest melt electrospun fibers reported to date and the smallest diameter fibers from a medical-grade degradable polymer using a melt processing technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available