4.6 Article

Robust Fault Estimation Using the Intermediate Observer: Application to the Quadcopter

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 20, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s20174917

Keywords

fault diagnosis; quadrotor; UAVs; sliding mode observer; sensor fault; quadcopter

Funding

  1. MSIT(Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC(Information Technology Research Center) [IITP-2020-2018-0-01423]
  2. Institute for Information & Communication Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP), Republic of Korea [2018-0-01423-003] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, an actuator fault estimation technique is proposed for quadcopters under uncertainties. In previous studies, matching conditions were required for the observer design, but they were found to be complex for solving linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). To overcome these limitations, in this study, an improved intermediate estimator algorithm was applied to the quadcopter model, which can be used to estimate actuator faults and system states. The system stability was validated using Lyapunov theory. It was shown that system errors are uniformly ultimately bounded. To increase the accuracy of the proposed fault estimation algorithm, a magnitude order balance method was applied. Experiments were verified with four scenarios to show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. Two first scenarios were compared to show the effectiveness of the magnitude order balance method. The remaining scenarios were described to test the reliability of the presented method in the presence of multiple actuator faults. Different from previous studies on observer-based fault estimation, this proposal not only can estimate the fault magnitude of the roll, pitch, yaw, and thrust channel, but also can estimate the loss of control effectiveness of each actuator under uncertainties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available