4.6 Review

Comparative mammary gland postnatal development and tumourigenesis in the sheep, cow, cat and rabbit: Exploring the menagerie

Journal

SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages 186-195

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.09.010

Keywords

Cat; Cow; Mammary gland; Rabbit; Sheep; Tumour

Funding

  1. Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland [ICA 1019 02]
  2. British Veterinary Association Animal Welfare Foundation Norman Hayward Fund [NHF_2016_03_KH]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sheep, cows, cats, and rabbits are used by humans for agricultural purposes and as companion animals. These species may be valuable comparative models of breast development and disease.
Sheep, cows, cats, and rabbits are kept by humans for agricultural purposes and as companion animals. Much of the mammary research in these species has focussed on mastitis in the case of ruminants and rabbits, and mammary tumourigenesis in cats and rabbits. However, similarities with the human breast suggest that these species may be currently underutilised as valuable comparative models of breast development and disease. The mammary gland undergoes cyclical postnatal development that will be considered here in the context of these non-traditional model species, with a focus on the mammary microenvironment at different postnatal developmental stages. The second part of this review will consider mammary tumour development. Ruminants are thought to be relatively 'resistant' to mammary tumourigenesis, likely due to multiple factors including functional properties of ruminant mammary stem/progenitor cells, diet, and/or the fact that production animals undergo a first parity soon after puberty. By contrast, unneutered female cats and rabbits have a propensity to develop mammary neoplasms, and subsets of these may constitute valuable comparative models of breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available