4.7 Article

Comparison of agricultural wastes and synthetic macromolecules as solid carbon source in treating low carbon nitrogen wastewater

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 739, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139885

Keywords

Carbon source; Kinetic; Denitrification; Agricultural wastes

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0500802]
  2. National Research Program for Key Issues in Air Pollution Control [DQGG0208]
  3. Beijing Municipal Education Commission [CEFF-PXM2019_014207_000099]
  4. National Major Science and Technology Project for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2015ZX07204-002-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigated the feasibility of using agricultural wastes and synthetic macromolecules as solid carbon sources and studied the effects of improvement of denitrification by the selected agricultural wastes. The carbon release capacity and denitrification performance of corncob (CC), peanut shell (PS), obsolescent rice (OR) and polycaprolactone (PCL), poly butylene suainate (PBS), polyvinyl alcohol sodium alginate (PVA-SA) were systematically analyzed. The results showed that for each carbon source, the first-order kinetic equation was basically followed during the carbon release process. PVA-SA, CC and PS had higher carbon release capacity with accumulative dissolved organic carbon (DOC) of 1622-20.63 mg.g(-1) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 100.86-134.10 mg.g(-1). Correspondingly, they showed excellent denitrification performance with almost no residual NO-N, and the denitrification process well followed the Monod equation. PCL, PBS and OR had lower carbon release capacity with accumulative DOC of 2.06-3.14 mg.g(-1) and COD of 1329-24.13 mg.g(-1), respectively. Nevertheless, these materials can also improve the denitrification performance, with the residual NO3--N in the range of 6.02-6.36 mg.L-1, and the effluent DOC was in the range of 10-15 mg.L-1. Synthetic polymers are more suitable for nitrogen removal in groundwater treatment, while agricultural wastes are ideal carbon sources for secondary effluent treatment. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available