4.7 Review

Insights into the mechanisms underlying the remediation potential o earthworms in contaminated soil: A critical review of research progress and prospects

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 740, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140145

Keywords

Vermiremediation; Soil pollution; Heavy metals; Organic contaminants; Mechanisms; Remediation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1806216, 41471411, 31971525]
  2. Shandong Provincial Government
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFD0800300]
  4. Key Program of Natural Science of Tianjin [17JCZDJC34200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, soil pollution is a major global concern drawing worldwide attention. Earthworms can resist high concentrations of soil pollutants and play a vital role in removing them effectively. Vermiremediation, using earthworms to remove contaminants from soil or help to degrade non-recyclable chemicals, is proved to be an alternative, low-cost technology for treating contaminated soil. However, knowledge about the mechanisms and framework of the vermiremediation various organic and inorganic contaminants is still limited. Therefore, we reviewed the research progress of effects of soil contaminants on earthworms and potential of earthworm used for remediation soil contaminated with heavy metals, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), polycydic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pesticides, as well as crude oil. Especially, the possible processes, mechanisms, advantages and limitations, and how to boost the efficiency of vermiremediation are well addressed in this review. Finally, future prospects of vermiremediation soil contamination are listed to promote further studies and application of vermiremediation in contaminated soils. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available