4.0 Article

Evaluation and selection of culture media for the detection of auxin-like compounds and phosphate solubilization on soil yeasts

Journal

REVISTA ARGENTINA DE MICROBIOLOGIA
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 78-83

Publisher

ASOCIACION ARGENTINA MICROBIOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ram.2020.06.008

Keywords

PGPY; Plant growth promoter

Categories

Funding

  1. MINCyT Argentina [FONCYT2014-PICT1839, PFIPESPRO2013, 007/13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to assess and select the best suitable media for detecting auxin-like compound production and inorganic-P solubilization on yeast strains. The use of new media formulations led to effective detection of these characteristics in yeasts.
The detection of characteristics associated with plant growth promotion has been studied frequently on bacteria and some of these detection methods were also used on yeasts. Sometimes, these methods, designed for prokaryotes, were used with no prior analysis regarding growth and production on eukaryotes. The aim of the present study was to assess and select the best suitable media for the detection of auxin-like compound production and inorganic-P. solubilization on yeast strains. Already published media and new formulations, as well as yeasts with different genetic backgrounds were used for the comparison. Media were selected based on the adequate growth of yeast strains and reliable recognition of the studied features either by an easy detection of the metabolite (color or halo production) or simple medium preparation (low number of reagent and regular autoclaving). We propose here the use of the new DEV medium with glucose and with tryptophan to identify auxin-like compounds producers; and CPM medium (a variation from Custer's Chalk Medium) as base medium to identify yeasts capable of inorganic-P solubilization. (C) 2020 Asociacion Argentina de Microbiologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available