4.5 Article

The continuum between GH deficiency and GH insensitivity in children

Journal

REVIEWS IN ENDOCRINE & METABOLIC DISORDERS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 91-99

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11154-020-09590-5

Keywords

Growth hormone deficiency; Growth hormone insensitivity; Idiopathic short stature; Insulin-like growth factor I

Funding

  1. Department of Health [NIHR300098] Funding Source: Medline
  2. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [NIHR300098] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The continuum of growth hormone (GH)-IGF-I axis defects ranges from severe to mild GH deficiency, including GH insensitivity, with various endocrine, biochemical, phenotypic and genetic abnormalities. While extreme cases are easily diagnosed, milder cases are less well defined and may overlap with idiopathic short stature conditions.
The continuum of growth hormone (GH)-IGF-I axis defects extends from severe to mild GH deficiency, through short stature disorders of undefined aetiology, to GH insensitivity disorders which can also be mild or severe. This group of defects comprises a spectrum of endocrine, biochemical, phenotypic and genetic abnormalities. The extreme cases are generally easily diagnosed because they conform to well-studied phenotypes with recognised biochemical features. The milder cases of both GH deficiency and GH insensitivity are less well defined and also overlap with the group of short stature conditions, labelled as idiopathic short stature (ISS). In this review the continuum model, which plots GH sensitivity against GH secretion, will be discussed. Defects causing GH deficiency and GH insensitivity will be described, together with the use of a diagnostic algorithm, designed to aid investigation and categorisation of these defects. The continuum will also be discussed in the context of growth-promoting endocrine therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available