4.4 Article

Associations between intrauterine exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls on neonatal ano-genital distance

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 67-75

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2020.06.005

Keywords

Polychlorinated biphenyls; Environmental contaminants; Prenatal exposure; Anogenital distance; Reproductive toxicity; Genital development

Funding

  1. Environmental and Health Fund (EHF), Israel [RGA1202]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) are widespread environmental contaminants. PCBs have endocrine disrupting properties which raises concerns regarding their effect on the developing fetus. This study aimed to examine the association between prenatal exposure to PCBs and anogenital distance (AGD) in newborns. Serum concentrations of PCB congeners -118, -138, -153 and -180 were measured in 175 pregnant women presenting to the delivery room. AGD was measured in their newborns. Regression models were used to estimate associations between maternal PCB exposure and infant anogenital measurements, controlling for possible confounding variables. Mean maternal serum concentrations were 2.95 +/- 2.18 ng/g, 4.62 +/- 3.54 ng/g, 7.67 +/- 6.42 ng/g and 5.10 +/- 3.91 ng/g for congeners -118, -138, -153 and -180, respectively. Higher maternal concentrations of PCBs were associated with reduced AGD measures in male infants. Higher maternal concentrations of PCB-138 and PCB-153 were associated with reduced ano-scrotal distances and higher maternal concentrations of all four PCB congeners were associated with reduced ano-penile distances. No significant associations were found between any PCB congener and any AGD measure in female newborns. This study demonstrates that intrauterine exposure to PCBs may be associated with reduced AGD in male newborns. More research is needed to reveal the implications for adult reproductive health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available