4.3 Review

Physical function after dietary weight loss in overweight and obese adults with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 338-353

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980020002529

Keywords

Osteoarthritis; Overweight; Obesity; Weight loss; Physical function

Funding

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effects of different dietary interventions on physical function in overweight and obese individuals with osteoarthritis. The findings suggest that partial use of meal replacements is as effective as their sole use in the more restrictive very low-energy diets (VLED). Both dietary interventions are more effective than lifestyle programmes in inducing significant weight loss and improving physical function.
Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) is associated with functional limitations that can impair mobility and reduce quality of life in affected individuals. Excess body weight in OA can exacerbate impaired physical function, highlighting the importance of weight management in this population. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the effects of different dietary interventions for weight loss on physical function in overweight and obese individuals with OA. Design: A comprehensive search of five databases was conducted to identify relevant articles for inclusion. Studies were included that examined the effect of dietary weight loss interventions, with or without exercise, on physical function in adults with OA who were overweight or obese. Quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Quality Criteria Checklist for primary research. Primary and secondary outcomes were extracted, including change in weight and physical function which included performance-based and self-report measures. Results: Nineteen relevant studies were included, which incorporated lifestyle interventions (n 8), diet in combination with meal replacements (DMR; n 5) and very low-energy diets (VLED; n 6) using meal replacements only. Pooled data for eight RCT indicated a mean difference in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function of 12.4 and 12.5 % following DMR or VLED interventions, respectively; however, no statistically significant change was detected for lifestyle interventions. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that partial use of meal replacements is as effective as their sole use in the more restrictive VLED. Both dietary interventions are more effective than lifestyle programmes to induce significant weight loss and improvements in physical function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available