4.5 Article

Genetics of neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Alzheimer's disease: A1-year follow-upstudy

Journal

PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES
Volume 74, Issue 12, Pages 645-651

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pcn.13150

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; dementia; genes; longitudinal study; neuropsychiatric symptoms

Funding

  1. Academia Sinica of Taiwan [AS-BD-108-2]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [106-2321-B-075-001-, 107-2321-B-075-001-, 107-2221-E-075-006-]
  3. Taipei Veterans General Hospital [V107C-032, V108C-113, V108D43-002-MY2-1]
  4. Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital [KMUH103-3R56]
  5. Brain Research Center, National Yang-Ming University from the Featured Areas Research Center Program within Ministry of Education in Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between candidate gene variants and domains of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and the changes in these associations over a 1-year period. Methods Seven hundred and ninety-three Taiwanese participants (47.8% female) with Alzheimer's disease (AD) were enrolled. Genes associated with a risk of developing AD were selected as candidate genes. NPS were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q), and the NPI-Q total score and sub-scores for the Psychosis, Mood, and Frontal Syndrome domains were calculated. Results Patients with AD and theAPOE epsilon 4 allele exhibited more obvious symptoms of psychosis. Mood symptoms were associated withCD33rs3865444 andEPHA1rs11767557, and frontal symptoms were associated withSORL1rs3824968. A 1-year Time x Alleles interaction effect ofCD33rs3865444 on mood symptoms was discerned. Conclusion Risk genes of AD, which are also associated with NPS, areAPOE epsilon 4 for psychosis,CD33andEPHA1for mood symptoms, andSORL1for frontal symptoms. The association betweenCD33and mood symptoms is dynamic and could change over 1 year; however, the results should be interpreted with caution because corrections for multiple comparisons were not performed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available