4.6 Article

Computational design of mixed chirality peptide macrocycles with internal symmetry

Journal

PROTEIN SCIENCE
Volume 29, Issue 12, Pages 2433-2445

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pro.3974

Keywords

chelation; computational design; de novo design; non‐ canonical amino acids; peptides; protein folding; racemic crystallography; symmetry

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [S10 RR029205] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [P30 GM124165] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cyclic symmetry is frequent in protein and peptide homo-oligomers, but extremely rare within a single chain, as it is not compatible with free N- and C-termini. Here we describe the computational design of mixed-chirality peptide macrocycles with rigid structures that feature internal cyclic symmetries or improper rotational symmetries inaccessible to natural proteins. Crystal structures of three C2- and C3-symmetric macrocycles, and of six diverse S2-symmetric macrocycles, match the computationally-designed models with backbone heavy-atom RMSD values of 1 angstrom or better. Crystal structures of an S4-symmetric macrocycle (consisting of a sequence and structure segment mirrored at each of three successive repeats) designed to bind zinc reveal a large-scale zinc-driven conformational change from an S4-symmetric apo-state to a nearly inverted S4-symmetric holo-state almost identical to the design model. These symmetric structures provide promising starting points for applications ranging from design of cyclic peptide based metal organic frameworks to creation of high affinity binders of symmetric protein homo-oligomers. More generally, this work demonstrates the power of computational design for exploring symmetries and structures not found in nature, and for creating synthetic switchable systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available