4.8 Article

Cyclic peptides can engage a single binding pocket through highly divergent modes

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2003086117

Keywords

de novo cyclic peptides; BET bromodomain inhibition; structural biology; BRD3; BRD4

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [APP 1161623, APP 1174941]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [657292]
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
  4. Platform Project for Supporting Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (Basis for Supporting Innovative Drug Discovery and Life Science Research) [JP19am0101090]
  5. The Francis Crick Institute from Cancer Research UK [FC001748]
  6. UK Medical Research Council [FC001748]
  7. Wellcome Trust [FC001748]
  8. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [657292] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cyclic peptide library screening technologies show immense promise for identifying drug leads and chemical probes for challenging targets. However, the structural and functional diversity encoded within such libraries is largely undefined. We have systematically profiled the affinity, selectivity, and structural features of library-derived cyclic peptides selected to recognize three closely related targets: the acetyllysine-binding bromodomain proteins BRD2, -3, and -4. We report affinities as low as 100 pM and specificities of up to 10(6)-fold. Crystal structures of 13 peptide-bromodomain complexes reveal remarkable diversity in both structure and binding mode, including both alpha-helical and beta-sheet structures as well as bivalent binding modes. The peptides can also exhibit a high degree of structural preorganization. Our data demonstrate the enormous potential within these libraries to provide diverse binding modes against a single target, which underpins their capacity to yield highly potent and selective ligands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available