4.8 Article

Mosquito metabolomics reveal that dengue virus replication requires phospholipid reconfiguration via the remodeling cycle

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2015095117

Keywords

mosquito; dengue; metabolomics; replication; phospholipid

Funding

  1. National Medical Research Council, Singapore [NMRC/ZRRF/0007/2017]
  2. Ministry of Education, Singapore [MOE2015-T3-1-003]
  3. French embassy in Singapore for Singapore-France travel (2018 PHC Merlion project) [6.01.18]
  4. Duke-NUS Signature Research Programme - Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A-STAR), Singapore
  5. Ministry of Health, Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dengue virus (DENV) subdues cell membranes for its cellular cycle by reconfiguring phospholipids in humans and mosquitoes. Here, we determined how and why DENV reconfigures phospholipids in the mosquito vector. By inhibiting and activating the de novo phospholipid biosynthesis, we demonstrated the antiviral impact of de novo-produced phospholipids. In line with the virus hijacking lipids for its benefit, metabolomics analyses indicated that DENV actively inhibited the de novo phospholipid pathway and instead triggered phospholipid remodeling. We demonstrated the early induction of remodeling during infection by using isotope tracing in mosquito cells. We then confirmed in mosquitoes the antiviral impact of de novo phospholipids by supplementing infectious blood meals with a de novo phospholipid precursor. Eventually, we determined that phospholipid reconfiguration was required for viral genome replication but not for the other steps of the virus cellular cycle. Overall, we now propose that DENV reconfigures phospholipids through the remodeling cycle to modify the endomembrane and facilitate formation of the replication complex. Furthermore, our study identified de novo phospholipid precursor as a blood determinant of DENV human-to-mosquito transmission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available