4.8 Article

Near-hysteresis-free soft tactile electronic skins for wearables and reliable machine learning

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2010989117

Keywords

sensor; electronic skin; machine learning; robotics; wearable

Funding

  1. Singapore National Research Fellowship (NRFF) [2017-08]
  2. Singapore National Robotics Program Office [182 25 00053]
  3. Agency for Science Technology and Research A*STAR [A18A1B0045]
  4. National University of Singapore (NUS) [2017-01]
  5. Institute for Health Innovation and Technology
  6. N.1 Institute for Health, NUS
  7. NUS Research Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electronic skins are essential for real-time health monitoring and tactile perception in robots. Although the use of soft elastomers and microstructures have improved the sensitivity and pressuresensing range of tactile sensors, the intrinsic viscoelasticity of soft polymeric materials remains a long-standing challenge resulting in cyclic hysteresis. This causes sensor data variations between contact events that negatively impact the accuracy and reliability. Here, we introduce the Tactile Resistive Annularly Cracked E-Skin (TRACE) sensor to address the inherent trade-off between sensitivity and hysteresis in tactile sensors when using soft materials. We discovered that piezoresistive sensors made using an array of three-dimensional (3D) metallic annular cracks on polymeric microstructures possess high sensitivities (> 10(7) Omega . kPa(-1)), low hysteresis (2.99 +/- 1.37%) over a wide pressure range (0-20 kPa), and fast response (400 Hz). We demonstrate that TRACE sensors can accurately detect and measure the pulse wave velocity (PWV) when skin mounted. Moreover, we show that these tactile sensors when arrayed enabled fast reliable one-touch surface texture classification with neuromorphic encoding and deep learning algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available