4.8 Article

Nuclear receptor REVERBα is a state-dependent regulator of liver energy metabolism

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2005330117

Keywords

circadian clock; energy metabolism; liver; nuclear hormone receptor; NR1D1

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I018654/1]
  2. Medical Research Council [MR/N021479/1, MR/P00279X/1, MR/P011853/1, MR/P023576/1]
  3. National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  4. Wellcome Trust [107849/Z/15/Z]
  5. BBSRC [BB/I018654/1, BB/J017744/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MR/P011853/1, MR/P00279X/1, MR/N021479/1, MR/P023576/1, MR/P011853/2, MR/M008908/1, MR/P023576/2] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nuclear receptor REVERB alpha is a core component of the circadian clock and proposed to be a dominant regulator of hepatic lipid metabolism. Using antibody-independent ChIP-sequencing of REVERB alpha in mouse liver, we reveal a high-confidence cistrome and define direct target genes. REVERB alpha-binding sites are highly enriched for consensus RORE or RevDR2 motifs and overlap with corepressor complex binding. We find no evidence for transcription factor tethering and DNA-binding domain-independent action. Moreover, hepatocyte-specific deletion of Reverba drives only modest physiological and transcriptional dysregulation, with derepressed target gene enrichment limited to circadian processes. Thus, contrary to previous reports, hepatic REVERB alpha does not repress lipogenesis under basal conditions. REVERB alpha control of a more extensive transcriptional program is only revealed under conditions of metabolic perturbation (including mistimed feeding, which is a feature of the global Reverb alpha(-/-) mouse). Repressive action of REVERB alpha in the liver therefore serves to buffer against metabolic challenge, rather than drive basal rhythmicity in metabolic activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available