4.8 Article

Elucidating the G overshoot in soft materials with a yield transition via a time-resolved experimental strain decomposition

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2003869117

Keywords

elastoviscoplastic materials; yield stress; recoverable strain; Payne effect; oscillatory shearing

Funding

  1. NSF [1847389]
  2. Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at Sandia National Laboratories
  3. US Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003525]
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1847389] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Materials that exhibit yielding behavior are used in many applications, from spreadable foods and cosmetics to direct write three-dimensional printing inks and filled rubbers. Their key design feature is the ability to transition behaviorally from solid to fluid under sufficient load or deformation. Despite its widespread applications, little is known about the dynamics of yielding in real processes, as the nonequilibrium nature of the transition impedes understanding. We demonstrate an iteratively punctuated rheological protocol that combines strain-controlled oscillatory shear with stress-controlled recovery tests. This technique provides an experimental decomposition of recoverable and unrecoverable strains, allowing for solidlike and fluid-like contributions to a yield stress material's behavior to be separated in a time-resolved manner. Using this protocol, we investigate the overshoot in loss modulus seen in materials that yield. We show that this phenomenon is caused by the transition from primarily solid-like, viscoelastic dissipation in the linear regime to primarily fluid-like, plastic flow at larger amplitudes. We compare and contrast this with a viscoelastic liquid with no yielding behavior, where the contribution to energy dissipation from viscous flow dominates over the entire range of amplitudes tested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available