4.8 Article

Estimating unobserved SARS-CoV-2 infections in the United States

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2005476117

Keywords

coronavirus; emerging infectious disease; mathematical modeling; public health surveillance; silent transmission

Funding

  1. NSF Rapid Response Research Grant from Division of Environmental Biology [2027718]
  2. Arthur J. Schmitt Fellowship
  3. Eck Institute for Global Health Fellowship
  4. Richard and Peggy Notebaert Premier Fellowship
  5. NSF Rapid Response Research Grant from Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems [2027752]
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences
  7. Division Of Environmental Biology [2027718] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  9. Directorate For Engineering [2027752] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By March 2020, COVID-19 led to thousands of deaths and disrupted economic activity worldwide. As a result of narrow case definitions and limited capacity for testing, the number of unobserved severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections during its initial invasion of the United States remains unknown. We developed an approach for estimating the number of unobserved infections based on data that are commonly available shortly after the emergence of a new infectious disease. The logic of our approach is, in essence, that there are bounds on the amount of exponential growth of new infections that can occur during the first few weeks after imported cases start appearing. Applying that logic to data on imported cases and local deaths in the United States through 12 March, we estimated that 108,689 (95% posterior predictive interval [95% PPI]: 1,023 to 14,182,310) infections occurred in the United States by this date. By comparing the model's predictions of symptomatic infections with local cases reported over time, we obtained daily estimates of the proportion of symptomatic infections detected by surveillance. This revealed that detection of symptomatic infections decreased throughout February as exponential growth of infections outpaced increases in testing. Between 24 February and 12 March, we estimated an increase in detection of symptomatic infections, which was strongly correlated (median: 0.98; 95% PPI: 0.66 to 0.98) with increases in testing. These results suggest that testing was a major limiting factor in assessing the extent of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during its initial invasion of the United States.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available