4.7 Article

Nanographite Synthesized from Acidified Sucrose Microemulsions under Ambient Conditions

Journal

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 3133-3142

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01753

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GSK
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  3. EPSRC [EP/D070228/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D070228/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We show here that nanographite can be synthesized at room temperature and pressure through a simple process of acidifying sucrose microemulsions. This is in contrast to conventional wisdom, which stipulates that graphite can only be produced using high temperatures. Natural graphite arises via progressive metamorphisms of carbonaceous material subjected to temperatures above similar to 600 K and pressures >2 kbar. Synthetic pyrolytic graphite requires temperatures >2500 K, and even nanographite formation from amorphous carbons requires temperatures >850 K. Our synthesis route utilizes the dehydration of sucrose by concentrated sulfuric acid, a variant of the well-known carbon black snake experiment, which produces an amorphous carbonaceous product. Crucially, though, we conduct the reaction in nanometer-sized microemulsion droplets to exert control over the reaction and sheet stacking process. This ensures that only sufficiently pristine graphene nanosheets can stack, thereby producing nanographite in a simple one-step synthesis under ambient conditions. The primary nanographitic particles of size similar to 3-30 nm stack in crystallographic registry to form larger 250 nm- to mu m-sized nanographitic aggregates. The amount of nanographite produced from the microemulsions is limited, however, because the sucrose concentration must be kept very low to slow the reaction kinetics. Hence, this is not a viable method for commercially producing nanographite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available