4.2 Review

Wearable sensing devices for upper limbs: A systematic review

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0954411920953031

Keywords

Wearable devices; wearable designs; sensor technologies; wearable computing algorithms; wearable application

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91848206, 61621136008, U1613212, 61903011, 61803267]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [3204036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wearable sensing devices, as smart electronic devices that can be worn on the body, have attracted significant research interest in recent years. This paper provides an overview of upper-limb wearable device research, including key technologies and future trends, as well as an analysis of their advantages and disadvantages. Future research potential in developing better wearable sensing devices for upper limbs is highlighted.
Wearable sensing devices, which are smart electronic devices that can be worn on the body as implants or accessories, have attracted much research interest in recent years. They are rapidly advancing in terms of technology, functionality, size, and real-time applications along with the fast development of manufacturing technologies and sensor technologies. By covering some of the most important technologies and algorithms of wearable devices, this paper is intended to provide an overview of upper-limb wearable device research and to explore future research trends. The review of the state-of-the-art of upper-limb wearable technologies involving wearable design, sensor technologies, wearable computing algorithms and wearable applications is presented along with a summary of their advantages and disadvantages. Toward the end of this paper, we highlight areas of future research potential. It is our goal that this review will guide future researchers to develop better wearable sensing devices for upper limbs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available