4.6 Article

Experimental and numerical studies of downward flame spread over PMMA with and without addition of tri phenyl phosphate ?

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 4867-4875

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2020.07.082

Keywords

Flame retardant; PMMA; TPP; Flame spread; Numerical modeling

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [19-03-00611A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental and numerical studies were conducted on the downward flame spread over PMMA with and without TPP, showing that TPP can reduce flame spread rate. The research proposed the retardancy capability of TPP on gas-phase reaction through experiments and quantum chemistry calculations.
Experimental and numerical studies of downward flame spread over polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) with and without addition of triphenyl phosphate (TPP) are reported. Using the micro-thermocouple technique and molecular beam spectrometry, detailed flame structures of PMMA and PMMA + 10%TPP were measured. From the experiments and quantum chemistry calculations, the retardancy capability of TPP on gas-phase reaction is proposed. Addition of flame retardant (10%, 20% TPP) results in reduction of the flame spread rate, the mass burning rate and conductive heat flux from the flame to the polymer surface. Numerical calculation was carried out to simulate the downward flame spread over PMMA and PMMA-TPP slabs. Based on the assumption of the TPP gas phase retardancy performance, a modified one-step reaction rate constant with pre-exponent dependent on the TPP mass content in the polymer and TPP retardancy effectivity is proposed. The predicted results have been compared with the data from sophisticated experimental measurement on thermal and chemical structures of both PMMA and PMMA + TPP flames. (c) 2020 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available