4.4 Article

Potential sealing and repair of humanFMdefects after trauma with peptide amphiphiles and Cx43 antisense

Journal

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 89-99

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5826

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children [17QMU01]
  2. Rosetrees Trust [M808]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peptide amphiphiles functionalized with adhesive, migratory or regenerative sequences combined with amniotic fluid to repair fetal membrane defects. Co-culture with Cx43 antisense increased collagen levels but reduced GAG content.
Objective We examined whether peptide amphiphiles functionalised with adhesive, migratory or regenerative sequences could be combined with amniotic fluid (AF) to form plugs that repair fetal membrane (FM) defects after trauma and co-culture with connexin 43 (Cx43) antisense. Methods We assessed interactions between peptide amphiphiles and AF and examined the plugs in FM defects after trauma and co-culture with the Cx43antisense. Results Confocal microscopy confirmed directed self-assembly of peptide amphiphiles with AF to form a plug within minutes, with good mechanical properties. SEM of the plug revealed a multi-layered, nanofibrous network that sealed the FM defect after trauma. Co-culture of the FM defect with Cx43 antisense and plug increased collagen levels but reduced GAG. Culture of the FM defect with peptide amphiphiles incorporating regenerative sequences for 5 days, increased F-actin and nuclear cell contraction, migration and polarization of collagen fibers across the FM defect when compared to control specimens with minimal repair. Conclusions Whilst the nanoarchitecture revealed promising conditions to seal iatrogenic FM defects, the peptide amphiphiles need to be designed to maximize repair mechanisms and promote structural compliance with high mechanical tolerance that maintains tissue remodeling with Cx43 antisense for future treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available