4.7 Article

Thermal oxidation of cross-linked PE and EPR used as insulation materials: Multi-scale correlation over a wide range of temperatures

Journal

POLYMER TESTING
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106913

Keywords

Polyethylene; Ethylene-propylene copolymer; Thermo-oxidation; Multi-scale correlation; Arrhenius law; Activation energy

Funding

  1. Nexans

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the thermo-oxidation of cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) and cross-linked ethylene propylene rubber (XLEPR) used as electrical insulators in cable systems. Characterisation of the aged materials and calculation of activation energies were conducted, showing correlations between oxidation products, crystallinity changes, gel content variations, and mechanical property reductions in both materials. Despite a diffusion-limited oxidation (DLO) effect observed in the 1 mm thick samples, the results were consistent.
The thermo-oxidation (70-160 degrees C) of two polymeric materials widely used as electrical insulators in cable systems was studied. The polymers are cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) and cross-linked ethylene propylene rubber (XLEPR). Characterisation of the aged materials was performed by using FTIR spectroscopy, gel fraction, differential scanning calorimetry and tensile tests. Correlations were observed between the formation of oxidation products, the changes in crystallinity, the variation in gel content and the reduction in mechanical properties in both materials. By using a classical Arrhenius methodology, activation energies of XLPE and XLEPR were calculated in the temperature range 70-160 degrees C from spectroscopic measurements on 200 mu m thick films and from tensile test results on 1 mm thick samples: the average values are 103 kJ mol(-1) for XLPE and 102 kJ mol(-1) for XLEPR. The results were consistent despite a diffusion-limited oxidation (DLO) effect observed in the 1 mm thick samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available