4.6 Article

Sulphur availability modulatesArabidopsis thalianaresponses to iron deficiency

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237998

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French National Research Agency [ANR-17-CE20-0008]
  2. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  3. French Ministere de l'enseignement superieur et de la recherche
  4. INRAE (department of Biologie et Amelioration des Plantes)
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-17-CE20-0008] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among the mineral nutrients that are required for plant metabolism, iron (Fe) and sulphur (S) play a central role as both elements are needed for the activity of several proteins involved in essential cellular processes. A combination of physiological, biochemical and molecular approaches was employed to investigate how S availability influences plant response to Fe deficiency, using the model plantArabidopsis thaliana. We first observed that chlorosis symptom induced by Fe deficiency was less pronounced when S availability was scarce. We thus found that S deficiency inhibited the Fe deficiency induced expression of several genes associated with the maintenance of Fe homeostasis. This includes structural genes involved in Fe uptake (i.e.IRT1,FRO2,PDR9,NRAMP1) and transport (i.e.FRD3,NAS4) as well as a subset of their upstream regulators, namelyBTS,PYEand the four clade Ib bHLH. Last, we found that the over accumulation of manganese (Mn) in response to Fe shortage was reduced under combined Fe and S deficiencies. These data suggest that S deficiency inhibits the Fe deficiency dependent induction of the Fe uptake machinery. This in turn limits the transport into the root and the plant body of potentially toxic divalent cations such as Mn and Zn, thus limiting the deleterious effect of Fe deprivation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available