4.6 Article

Maximizing cohesion and separation for detecting protein functional modules in protein-protein interaction networks

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240628

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Tai-wan (R. O. C.) [MOST108-2221-E-027-025/MOST107-2410-H-182-005-MY2]
  2. Chang Gung Medical Foundation [BMRPA19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein Function Module (PFM) identification in Protein-Protein Interaction Networks (PPINs) is one of the most important and challenging tasks in computational biology. The quick and accurate detection of PFMs in PPINs can contribute greatly to the understanding of the functions, properties, and biological mechanisms in research on various diseases and the development of new medicines. Despite the performance of existing detection approaches being improved to some extent, there are still opportunities for further enhancements in the efficiency, accuracy, and robustness of such detection methods. Based on the uniqueness of the network-clustering problem in the context of PPINs, this study proposed a very effective and efficient model based on the Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun algorithm for detecting PFMs in PPINs. To demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed model, computational experiments are performed using three different categories of species datasets. The computational results reveal that the proposed model outperforms existing detection techniques in terms of two key performance indices, i.e., the degree of polymerization inside PFMs (cohesion) and the deviation degree between PFMs (separation), while being very fast and robust. The proposed model can be used to help researchers decide whether to conduct further expensive and time-consuming biological experiments and to select target proteins from large-scale PPI data for further detailed research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available