4.7 Article

Nighttime transpiration represents a negligible part of water loss and does not increase the risk of water stress in grapevine

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 387-398

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.13923

Keywords

circadian regulation; grapevine; nighttime transpiration; stomata; stomatal conductance; water loss

Categories

Funding

  1. EU
  2. ERA-NET
  3. ARIMNET2 project
  4. Opportunities for an Environmental-friendly Viticulture: EnViRoS
  5. Investments for the Future program [ANR-10-EQPX-16]
  6. Cluster of Excellence COTE of the French National Agency for Research [ANR-10-LABX-45]
  7. French Ministry of Agriculture, Agrifood, and Forestry (FranceAgriMer and CNIV) within the PHYSIOPATH project (program Plan National Deperissement du Vignoble) [22001150-1506]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that nighttime water loss in grapevines is relatively low compared to daytime transpiration, with daytime transpiration being the main cause of soil and plant water potential decreases; unlike daytime transpiration, nighttime transpiration does not respond to vapor pressure deficit and may be influenced by circadian regulation; modeling simulations indicate that nighttime stomatal conductance is not a significant factor in reaching critical hydraulic thresholds in grapevines.
Nighttime transpiration has been previously reported as a significant source of water loss in many species; however, there is a need to determine if this trait plays a key role in the response to drought. This study aimed to determine the magnitude, regulation and relative contribution to whole plant water-use, of nighttime stomatal conductance (g(night)) and transpiration (E-night) in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Our results showed that nighttime water loss was relatively low compared to daytime transpiration, and that decreases in soil and plant water potentials were mainly explained by daytime stomatal conductance (g(day)) and transpiration (E-day). Contrary to E-day, E-night did not respond to VPD and possible effects of an innate circadian regulation were observed. Plants with higher g(night) also exhibited higher daytime transpiration and carbon assimilation at midday, and total leaf area, suggesting that increased g(night) may be linked with daytime behaviors that promote productivity. Modeling simulations indicated that g(night) was not a significant factor in reaching critical hydraulic thresholds under scenarios of either extreme drought, or time to 20% of soil relative water content. Overall, this study suggests that g(night) is not significant in exacerbating the risk of water stress and hydraulic failure in grapevine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available