4.4 Article

Magnetic reconnection and kinetic waves generated in the Earth's quasi-parallel bow shock

Journal

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0012443

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE [DESC0016278]
  2. NSF [AGS-1619584, AGS-1552142]
  3. NASA [80NSSC18K1369]
  4. NASA MMS project
  5. International Space Science Institute's (ISSI) International Teams programme
  6. Research Council of Norway/CoE [223252/F50]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic reconnection in quasi-parallel shocks, relevant to the Earth's bow shock, is studied by means of two-dimensional full particle-in-cell simulations. As the Alfvenic Mach number increases, the propagation direction of the waves excited in the transition region changes, and the shock becomes more turbulent with more reconnection sites. In the higher Mach number shock, abundant electron-only reconnection sites are generated with scales on the order of the ion skin depth or less. Non-reconnecting current sheets can also generate electron jets and energy dissipation can occur there as well. However, non-reconnecting current sheets with the magnetic field reversal typically show a smaller energy dissipation rate than reconnecting current sheets. In the shock transition region, two types of waves are responsible for driving reconnection: one has a wavelength around three ion skin depths (d(i)), and the other has a wavelength less than 1 d(i). Electron and ion distribution functions show that in regions where the former type of waves is excited, there are two ion beams and a single-peaked electron distribution. In contrast, in regions where the latter type of waves is excited, there are multiple electron and ion beams. The waves propagating obliquely to the magnetic field bend the magnetic field lines, and magnetic reconnection occurs where oppositely directed field lines come into contact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available