4.8 Article

β Decays as Sensitive Probes of Lepton Flavor Universality

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 125, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.111801

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CERN
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P21_76884, PCEFP2_181117]
  3. DOE [DE-FG02-00ER41132]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PCEFP2_181117] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nuclear beta decays as well as the decay of the neutron are well-established low-energy probes of physics beyond the standard model (SM). In particular, with the axial-vector coupling of the nucleon g(A) determined from lattice QCD, the comparison between experiment and SM prediction is commonly used to derive constraints on right-handed currents. Further, in addition to the CKM element V-us from kaon decays, V-ud from beta decays is a critical input for the test of CKM unitarity. Here, we point out that the available information on beta decays can be reinterpreted as a stringent test of lepton flavor universality (LFU). In fact, we find that the ratio of V-us from kaon decays over V-us from beta decays (assuming CKM unitarity) is extremely sensitive to LFU violation (LFUV) in W-mu-nu couplings thanks to a CKM enhancement by (V-ud/V-us)(2) similar to 20. From this perspective, recent hints for the violation of CKM unitarity can be viewed as further evidence for LFUV, fitting into the existing picture exhibited by semileptonic B decays and the anomalous magnetic moments of muon and electron. Finally, we comment on the future sensitivity that can be reached with this LFU violating observable and discuss complementary probes of LFU that may reach a similar level of precision, such as Gamma (pi -> mu nu)/Gamma(pi -> e nu) at the PEN and PiENu experiments or even direct measurements of W -> mu nu at an FCC-ee.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available