4.8 Article

First Results on Dark Matter Substructure from Astrometric Weak Lensing

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 125, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.111101

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF7392]
  2. Thomas J. Moore dissertation fellowship
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0011640]
  4. Simons Foundation
  5. NSF [PHY-1620727, PHY-1915409]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low-mass structures of dark matter (DM) are expected to be entirely devoid of light-emitting regions and baryons. Precisely because of this lack of baryonic feedback, small-scale substructures of the Milky Way are a relatively pristine testing ground for discovering aspects of DM microphysics and primordial fluctuations on subgalactic scales. In this Letter, we report results from the first search for Galactic DM subhalos with time-domain astrometric weak gravitational lensing. The analysis is based on a matched-filter template of local lensing corrections to the proper motion of stars in the Magellanic Clouds. We describe a data analysis pipeline detailing sample selection, background subtraction, and the handling of outliers and other systematics. For tentative candidate lenses, we identify a signature based on an anomalous parallax template that can unequivocally confirm the presence of a DM lens, opening up prospects for robust discovery potential with full time-series data. We present our constraints on substructure fraction f(l) less than or similar to 5 at 90% C.L. (and f(l) less than or similar to 2 at 50% C.L.) for compact lenses with radii r(l) < 1 pc, with best sensitivity reached for lens masses M-l around 10(7)-10(8) M-circle dot. Parametric improvements are expected with future astrometric datasets; by end of mission, Gaia could reach f(l) less than or similar to 10(-3) for these massive point-like objects and he sensitive to lighter and/or more extended subhalos for O(1) substructure fractions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available