4.8 Article

GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M⊙

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 125, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.101102

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research of India
  2. Department of Science and Technology, India
  3. Science AMP
  4. Engineering Research Board (SERB), India
  5. Ministry of Human Resource Development, India
  6. Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion, Spain
  7. Vicepresidencia i Conselleria d'Innovacio, Recerca i Turisme del Govern de les Illes Balears, Spain
  8. Conselleria d'Educacio i Universitat del Govern de les Illes Balears, Spain
  9. Conselleria d'Innovacio, Universitats, Ciencia i Societat Digital de la Generalitat Valenciana, Spain
  10. CERCA Programme Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain
  11. National Science Centre of Poland
  12. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  13. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  14. Russian Science Foundation
  15. European Commission
  16. European Regional Development Funds (ERDF)
  17. Royal Society
  18. Scottish Funding Council
  19. Scottish Universities Physics Alliance
  20. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA)
  21. French Lyon Institute of Origins (LIO)
  22. Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FRS-FNRS), Belgium
  23. Actions de Recherche Concertees (ARC), Belgium
  24. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen (FWO), Belgium
  25. Paris Ile-de-France Region
  26. National Research, Development and Innovation Office Hungary (NKFIH)
  27. National Research Foundation of Korea
  28. Industry Canada
  29. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  30. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council Canada
  31. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  32. Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations, and Communications
  33. International Center for Theoretical Physics South American Institute for Fundamental Research (ICTPSAIFR)
  34. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong
  35. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  36. Leverhulme Trust
  37. Research Corporation
  38. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan
  39. Kavli Foundation
  40. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN)
  41. French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  42. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  43. Ministry of Science & ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea [B20710000] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  44. STFC [ST/T000325/1, ST/S000550/1, ST/N000072/1, ST/N00003X/1, ST/T00049X/1, ST/R00045X/1, ST/N000633/1, ST/V001019/1, ST/I006269/1, ST/P000673/1, ST/N005430/1, ST/T000147/1, ST/K000845/1, ST/N005422/1, ST/V001396/1, ST/V001167/1, 1947165, ST/S000305/1, ST/V001337/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On May 21, 2019 at 03:02:29 UTC Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo observed a short duration gravitational-wave signal, GW190521, with a three-detector network signal-to-noise ratio of 14.7, and an estimated false-alarm rate of 1 in 4900 yr using a search sensitive to generic transients. If GW190521 is from a quasicircular binary inspiral, then the detected signal is consistent with the merger of two black holes with masses of 85(-14)(+21) M-circle dot and 66(-18)(+17) M-circle dot (90% credible intervals). We infer that the primary black hole mass lies within the gap produced by (pulsational) pair-instability supernova processes, with only a 0.32% probability of being below 65 M-circle dot. We calculate the mass of the remnant to be 142(-16)(+28) M-circle dot, which can be considered an intermediate mass black hole (IMBH). The luminosity distance of the source is 5.3(-2.6)(+2.4) Gpc, corresponding to a redshift of 0.82(-0.34)(+0.28). The inferred rate of mergers similar to GW190521 is 0.13(-0.11)(+0.30) Gpc(-3) yr(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available