4.4 Article

Toward Superconducting Electron Accelerators for Various Applications

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.202000294

Keywords

electron linac; high‐ temperature superconducting materials; superconducting radiofrequency cavity

Funding

  1. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Machinery Systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tohoku University constructed a 300 MeV electron linac in 1967 for nuclear physics and neutron science research. Despite some parts collapsing in the 2011 earthquake, high-intensity beams are still supplied. The possibility of introducing a new SRF cavity system to expand research activities is being considered.
A 300 MeV electron linac is constructed in 1967 at Tohoku University for advanced research on nuclear physics, radiochemistry and neutron science. A very high beam repetition rate of 300 pps is employed to achieve a duty factor of more than 0.1%. Although substantial parts of the linac sadly collapsed as a result of the Great East Japan earthquake occurred in 2011, the low-energy part of the linac still supplies high-intensity beams. To expand current research activities, the introduction of a versatile accelerator system that employs superconducting radiofrequency (SRF) cavities have been considered. Because the low surface resistance on these SRF cavities decreases the power dissipated to the cavity walls, the beams can be accelerated with a duty factor as high as 100%. However, the SRF cavities, which are manufactured from niobium (Nb), need to be operated at cryogenic temperatures of 2 K with a considerably large cryogenic system. Recently it is pointed out that the large heat load could be greatly lowered by replacing the standard Nb cavities with those coated with high-temperature superconductors. The possibility of developing simple and low-cost SRF accelerators based on conduction cooling with a 4 K refrigerator system is anticipated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available