4.2 Review

Assessing the quality of studies in meta-research: Review/guidelines on the most important quality assessment tools

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Nutrition & Dietetics

The addition of STROBE-nut to the EJCN instructions to authors: some considerations and caveats

Carl Lachat et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

A cross-sectional bibliometric study showed suboptimal journal endorsement rates of STROBE and its extensions

Melissa K. Sharp et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Using the STROBE statement: survey findings emphasized the role of journals in enforcing reporting guidelines

Melissa K. Sharp et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Review Anesthesiology

The STROBE guidelines

Sarah Cuschieri

SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA (2019)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Use of the STROBE Checklist to Evaluate the Reporting Quality of Observational Research in Obstetrics

April D. Adams et al.

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2018)

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

The CONSORT guidelines for noninferiority trials should be updated to go beyond the absolute risk difference

Walter Palmas

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)

Review Mathematical & Computational Biology

Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale

Claudio Luchini et al.

WORLD JOURNAL OF META-ANALYSIS (2017)

Review Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Extranodal extension in N1-adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and papilla of Vater: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its prognostic significance

Claudio Luchini et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY (2016)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Extranodal Extension of Nodal Metastases Is a Poor Prognostic Indicator in Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Nicola Veronese et al.

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY (2016)

Article Oncology

Prognostic Impact of Extra-Nodal Extension in Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Nicola Veronese et al.

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2015)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers' to authors' assessments

Carson Ka-Lok Lo et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2014)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care Users' Guides to the Medical Literature

Mohammad Hassan Murad et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2014)

Article Surgery

The Levels of Evidence and Their Role in Evidence-Based Medicine

Patricia B. Burns et al.

PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY (2011)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Julian P. T. Higgins et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2011)

Editorial Material Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses

Andreas Stang

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

Beverley J. Shea et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

David Moher et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2009)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)

Beverley J. Shea et al.

PLOS ONE (2007)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration

Jan P. Vandenbroucke et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2007)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

Beverley J. Shea et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2007)