Journal
PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 49-62Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10916466.2020.1831533
Keywords
carbon dioxide storage; CBM recovery; coal swelling; gas flow dynamics; gas adsorption
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study uses a mathematical model to explain the effects of gas injection on gas sorption, flow, and permeability, finding that pure N2 injection can increase permeability without losing injectivity, while pure CO2 injection significantly reduces permeability.
Nitrogen (N-2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) gases injection yield substantially various recovery ways. Here, a one-dimensional mathematical model is applied comprising of mass balances for explaining gas sorption and flow, and a geomechanical relationship to describe the permeability changes during gas injection. That's why numerical simulations for investigating the performance of injecting flue gas mixture in enhanced coal bed methane (ECBM) recovery are represented. Significant intuitive features are found regarding the gas flow dynamics at the time of displacement and influences of sorption on ECBM operation. The study revealed that the injection of pure CO(2)causes much reduction in cleat permeability, but pure N(2)is injected to increase the permeability without any loss of injectivity. Therefore, pure CO(2)causes more efficient displacement in terms of total CH(4)recovery, while the addition of N(2)to the mixture assists to make quicker the initial methane recovery.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available