4.2 Article

Identification of unique long non-coding RNAs as putative biomarkers for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

Journal

PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 9-19

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/pme-2020-0020

Keywords

bioinformatics; biomarker; chromophobe renal cell carcinoma; differentially expressed genes; hub gene; long non-coding RNA; The Cancer Genome Atlas; weighted gene coexpression network analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, through weighted gene coexpression network analysis, five hub lncRNAs were identified as potential biomarkers for the progression and prognosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Aim:To investigate whether long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) can be utilized as molecular biomarkers in predicting the occurrence and progression of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.Methods & results:Genetic and related clinical traits of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma were downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas and used to construct modules using weighted gene coexpression network analysis. In total, 44,889 genes were allocated into 21 coexpression modules depending on intergenic correlation. Among them, the green module was the most significant key module identified by module-trait correlation calculations (R-2 = 0.43 and p = 4e-04). Gene ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analyses demonstrated that genes in the green module were enriched in many pathways. Coexpression, protein-protein interaction networks, screening for differentially expressed genes, and survival analysis were used to select hub lncRNAs. Five hub lncRNAs (TTK,CENPE,KIF2C,BUB1, andRAD51AP1) were selected out.Conclusion:Our findings suggest that the five lncRNAs may act as potential biomarkers for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma progression and prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available