4.5 Article

Foliar N Concentration and Reflectance Meters to Guide N Fertilization for Anthracnose Management of Annual Bluegrass Putting Green Turf

Journal

CROP SCIENCE
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages 3328-3337

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2015.12.0765

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. New England Regional Turfgrass Foundation
  2. Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station
  3. Hatch Act Funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Site-specific management using objective assays to determine N requirement based on canopy reflectance could improve current recommendations for cultural control of anthracnose (Colletotrichum cereale Manns sensu lato Crouch, Clarke, and Hillman). The objectives of this study were to determine the relationships among foliar sap nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) concentrations, canopy reflectance indices (normalized difference vegetation index [NDVI] and chlorophyll index [CI]), foliar total N concentrations, and N rate on anthracnose severity in annual bluegrass (ABG), Poa annua L. f. reptans (Hausskn) T. Koyama. A 2-yr field study was conducted on ABG putting green turf in Storrs, CT. Nitrogen treatments were applied as urea at 0.0 to 36.8 kg ha(-1) every 14 d in spring and summer of 2011 to 2012. Anthracnose severity declined linearly with increasing biweekly N rate from 0 kg ha(-1) up to the estimated critical level of 12.8 kg ha(-1). A minimum critical foliar N concentration of 33.5 g kg(-1) maintained anthracnose at <= 32% plot area. Canopy reflectance indices were correlated with foliar N concentration. Anthracnose severity decreased linearly as relative NDVI and relative CI increased. Maintaining relative NDVI between 0.94 to 0.98 through N fertility alone would provide a similar to 76 to 93% probability of maintaining <= 32% turf area infested, or relative CI range of 0.73 to 0.93 had the same result similar to 40 to 98% of the time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available