4.3 Article

Drug-induced reactive oxygen species-mediated inhibitory effect on growth ofTrypanosoma evansiin axenic culture system

Journal

PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 119, Issue 10, Pages 3481-3489

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-020-06861-7

Keywords

Trypanosoma evansi; Surra; Trypanosomosis; ROS measurement assay; Growth inhibition assay; In vitro resazurin cytotoxicity assay

Categories

Funding

  1. ICAR-New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Trypanosoma evansi, an extracellular haemoflagellate, has a wide range of hosts receptive and susceptible to infection, in which it revealed highly inconsistent clinical effects. Drugs used for the treatment of trypanosomosis have been utilized for more than five decades and have several problems like local and systemic toxicity. In the present investigation, imatinib and sorafenib were selected as drugs as they are reported to have the potential to cause reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated effect in cancer cells. Both have also been reported to have potential againstT. brucei,T. cruziandLeishmania donovani. To date, imatinib and sorafenib have not evaluated for their growth inhibitory effect againstT. evansi. Imatinib and sorafenib showed significant (p < 0.001) inhibition on parasite growth and multiplication with IC50(50% inhibitory concentration) values 6.12 mu M and 0.33 mu M respectively againstT. evansi. Both the drug molecules demonstrated for the generation of ROS inT. evansiand were found up to 65% increased level of ROS as compared with negative control in the axenic culture system. Furthermore, different concentrations of imatinib and sorafenib were found non-toxic on horse peripheral blood mononuclear cells and Vero cell lines. Also, in conclusion, our results demonstrated that imatinib- and sorafenib-induced generation of ROS contributed inhibitory effect on the growth ofTrypanosoma evansiin an axenic culture system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available