4.5 Article

Monitoring of insecticide resistance in Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from four districts of Punjab, Pakistan to conventional and new chemistry insecticides

Journal

CROP PROTECTION
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 177-184

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2015.08.024

Keywords

Insecticide resistance; Pyrethroids; Organophosphates; Carbamates; Spodoptera litura

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies were carried out to evaluate the resistance of Pakistani populations of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera litura (F) to several commonly used insecticides. Different field populations of S. litura from four districts of the Punjab were monitored from 2009 to 2011 for resistance to insecticides using a standard leaf dip bioassay method. For organophosphates and pyrethroids, resistance ratios compared with a susceptible Lab-Pk population were in the range of 8-109 fold for deltamethrin, 11-139 fold for cypermethrin, 19-143 fold for chlorpyrifos and 39-162 fold for profenofos. For new chemistry insecticides, resistance levels were 2-74 fold for spinosad, 4-216 fold for abamectin, 7-87 fold for indoxacarb, 2-77 fold for emamectin benzoate, 1.9-58 fold for lufenuron and 4-43 fold for methoxyfenozide. Pairwise correlation coefficients of LC50 values showed a positive correlation with cross-resistance among deltamethrin, cypermethrin and chlorpyrifos, while resistance to profenofos showed correlations with resistances to other insecticides except chlorpyrifos. New chemistry insecticides showed no correlations between any of the tested insecticides, There were high to very high levels of resistance to organophosphates in most of the population, which suggested that the use of these should be avoided against this pest. Selective use of pyrethroids in several areas, including Bahawalpur and Lodhran, where the pest showed a low level of resistance, would appear to be acceptable, the new chemistry insecticides, lufenuron, methoxyfenozide, emamectin and indoxacarb had no, very low, low and moderate resistance levels against populations, respectively. These are considered to be safe to the environment and safer to natural enemies. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available